On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:48 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 03:39 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
@@ -152,9 +153,9 @@ close(fd);
+ execl (DSPAM, DSPAM, "--user", user, "--source=error", "--stdout", class_arg, sign_arg, NULL);
So with what configuration is that actually necessary? I know that my configuration works fine as-is. Should we make this optional?
johannes
I am attaching my dspam.conf, hopefully attachments aren't a pain. I will remember what you said about patches or, if acceptable, I will attach them in the future. If it isn't necessary in most configurations, then maybe an ifdef around the two versions of the two lines with a define right after the main comment body at the beginning of the source. Trever -- "Blessed is the man, who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact." -- George Eliot