On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 03:07:44 PM Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:50:54 -0700 errno errno@cox.net articulated:
Below, I've provide the relevant snippets of my current functional configuration; how best to integrate procmail into the mix?
Why procmail? Use sieve instead. It is fully supported in Dovecot and IMHO far easier to use.
I hear you, and agree - I was able to determine that sieve was better supported. Unfortunately, I'm doing this for a client who is rather set in his ways and already has a largish custom procmail filter he wants/needs to use. For me to tell him, "no we need to use sieve instead", he will see that as a failure on my part; and/or will request that I install and configure a different combination of software that will facilitate his familiar territory of procmail.
Seeing as I already have postfix and dovecot functioning, I'd rather just get procmail in there and be done with it; is this possible?
Thankyou!