Timo,
would you be interested in implementing an LMTP interface for deliver?
That would make Dovecot a stand-alone mailstore server, no local MTA required.
GeertOn Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:31:53PM +0200, FORMER 03|Baltasar Cevc wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up our new mail system using dovecot as mailbox server. As our goal is to have many many small redundant (virtual) servers as components, for example a mailhub (just relaying mail) and a frontend smtp server (just accepting or denying mail in the first place and then forwarding it to the mailhub), etc. I want to run Dovecot on a different server than the main MTAs. The mailbox server is the only service that cannot be made redundant in an easy way (the servers don't have common storage and we can't add that easily), thus I prefer not to have it on the same server as the relay.
Is there a best practice to do that? My current ideas are either to implement a stripped-down Postfix in the Dovecot server or to use some qpsmtpd setup there, both just to call the Dovecot delivery program. SMTP will be the communication protocol for the components except dovecot. (e.g. the virus scanner will be implemented as SMTP proxy).
I'm quite bad at ASCII art, but I'll try anyways to illustrate the setup:
I <--> [public incoming MX] -------------
N | T \|/ E <--> [customer mailrelay] -----> [Postfix Mailhub] <====> virusscanner R | | N <-------outgoing mails-------------/ | E | T <--> [dovecot mailstore] <-mail deliveryEach of the subsystems will be on a different virtual server in order to have small systems with distinct functions and to improve scalability. Everything except the dovecot server is planned to be duplicated on two different hardware machines (e.g. mx-in1 on server1, mx-in2 on server 2, mailhub1 on server1, mailhub2 on server2, virusscanner on server 2 and 3, etc. or something similar).
Thanx, Baltasar
--
_____ FORMER 03 GmbH _____ infanteriestra§e 19 haus 6 eg _____ 80797 muenchen
_____ www.former03.de _____ phone +49 - 176 - 23 22 08 22