Thanks for mentioning dspam.. I've never heard of it.. I've been using
Spamassassin for a while and while it does work pretty good with my
exim mail server (and rejecting them at SMTP time), the overhead for
the Perl interpretter is killing me. I'm running on a itty bitty box
with only 64Mb of RAM and SA consumes about 20Mb for each instance..
I'll be switching if possible (it's building right now).
Thanks!
-- Rick
On Dec 14, 2004, at 3:47 PM, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 18:53 schrieb Johannes Berg:
why not do it at delivery stage from your MTA? imho it is the better place for spamassassin.
Sure. I want to filter there, but want to have the ability to later re-classify messages by just moving them out or into the spam folder (which will be cleaned up by age)
Mh, that's just what I am doing... I'm using dspam and every user has a folder which collects eMails classified as spam, and which has two subfolders: One where the user can move false negatives into and one
for false positives. All messages in these folders are used to retrain
dspam on a regular basis.I run dovecot 0.99.something on this machine but it has absolutely
nothing to do with dspam or the re-train mechanism - so, actually I'm not
really understanding what you are asking for. ;) Do you want a single global spam collector box for all users? If yes, you should consider what happens if some confidential mail of a user gets wrongly classified as spam...Greetings,
Gunter
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+
- http://aachen.uni-dsl.de/ - Der direkte Draht in's
Hochschulnetz! + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+
Frische Luft: Das, was aus der Klimaanlage kommt (Marcus
http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/usenet/ Fachbegriffe.der.Informatik.htm l#374 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+
Stögbauer)
PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt!- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+