28 May
2009
28 May
'09
4:47 a.m.
At 04:21 PM 5/27/2009, you wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:02 -0400, dovecot@corwyn.net wrote: yes, and use NAS not SAN
Why NAS and not SAN?
you could also use DNS load balancing in a away that has 0 cache TTL on MX addresses, thats better than a software based LB if you cant afford a hardware LB
I'm not sure I understand that. The MX records have little to do with Dovecot richt (as that would be where things look for the SMTP record), which would be inbound mail which is handled by the SMTP server (in my case postfix).
I can see load balancing DNS for what the IMAP server is, but why the MX records?
Rick