On 06/11/2023 16:48 EET lejeczek via dovecot dovecot@dovecot.org wrote:
Hi guys.
I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes. ... lmtp(minemail@lemko.xyz)<2674357><uATxGqbaSGW1zigAn4O9eQ>: Error: lmtp-server: conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail@my.private: Mailbox INBOX: Corrupted transaction log file /VMAIL/my.private/minemail/dovecot.index.log seq 4: ext intro: name_size too large (sync_offset=6368) ... Above happened if the same one user was having mail delivered on two Postfix+Dovecot servers at the same time.
I hope experts who know Dovecot's internals better can tell... having such multiple node/server Dovecots "talking" to that same network mount-point but!.. only one Dovecot being active - having Postfix using it and other, however many, Dovecots only "idling" - not having Postifx using it (+ no client connections is a goal too) Would that make such multi-Dovecot setup safe & free from errors as above & any storage related ones?
Or perhaps there are other ways to have many Dovecots with the same user-base, using same networked storage simultaneously?
many thanks, L.
Hi guys.
I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes. ... lmtp(minemail@lemko.xyz)<2674357><uATxGqbaSGW1zigAn4O9eQ>: Error: lmtp-server: conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail@my.private: Mailbox INBOX: Corrupted transaction log file /VMAIL/my.private/minemail/dovecot.index.log seq 4: ext intro: name_size too large (sync_offset=6368) ... Above happened if the same one user was having mail delivered on two Postfix+Dovecot servers at the same time.
I hope experts who know Dovecot's internals better can tell... having such multiple node/server Dovecots "talking" to that same network mount- point but!.. only one Dovecot being active - having Postfix using it and other, however many, Dovecots only "idling" - not having Postifx using it (+ no client connections is a goal too) Would that make such multi-Dovecot setup safe & free from errors as above & any storage related ones?
Or perhaps there are other ways to have many Dovecots with the same user-base, using same networked storage simultaneously?
many thanks, L.
Hi!
See https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/nfs/
This applies to other shared mountpoints too.
Aki