On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
On 7/28/2011 2:51 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
Again, you need to be asking these things on the Postfix list. I don't know why you refuse to do so. You'd get all the answers you need in a heartbeat. You're totally off topic now on this list...
I'm here because the problem has been raised when I have introduced dovecot and sieve into delivery chain. There were some related issues that I thought I could fix here, but it's not the right place --evidently :-). In any case. As you see without dovecot there are no problems with outbound mail. And your cue is right: I need two distinct paths. Thanks (a lot) and you don't be so rude, I not deserve this. -Andrea Jul 29 10:25:58 hostname postfix/smtpd[29006]: E198D2548187: client=host.name[**.**.***.***], sasl_method=CRAM-MD5, sasl_username=user@example.com Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/cleanup[32005]: E198D2548187: message-id=<4E326EA5.4090901@example.com> Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/qmgr[9011]: E198D2548187: from=<user@example.com>, size=620, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/pickup[32212]: 16CE7254818F: uid=5001 from=<user@example.com> Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/pipe[31772]: E198D2548187: to=<nonews.org@gmail.com>, relay=spamassassin, delay=0.21, delays=0.14/0/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via spamassassin service) Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/cleanup[32024]: 16CE7254818F: message-id=<4E326EA5.4090901@example.com> Jul 29 10:25:59 hostname postfix/qmgr[9011]: 16CE7254818F: from=<user@example.com>, size=919, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 29 10:26:00 hostname postfix/smtp[31799]: 16CE7254818F: to=<nonews.org@gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209.85.229.27]:25, delay=1.6, delays=0/0/0.1/1.5, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1311927981 e61si3417783wed.143)