18 Jun
2012
18 Jun
'12
8:30 p.m.
On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat. Better in what respect?
less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)
Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.