-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:01:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/2/2009, tomas@tuxteam.de (tomas@tuxteam.de) wrote: [...]
Hm. I think Reiser is [...]
Lets please stop with the FUD.
Oops. Sorry. I didn't want to step on anyone's toes.
Yes, Reiserfs had a few bugs early on... but I have been running 3 production servers on it for 4 years [...]
YMMV. As I said, I have a couple of big (albeit not heavily used) FS on Reiser and am quite happy up to now.
If you based your decision of what filesystem to use on whether or not there have ever been any serious problems encountered with it, you wouldn't have a computer.
No. I base my assessment on other people's experiences. One of the real downsides or Reiser at the moment seems to be that it is more prone to silent corruption (triggered by hardware problems). I don't have the time now to provide references, but if interested, I'll dig it up (maybe it's time to take this off-list anyway :)
Regards
- -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKTJXiBcgs9XrR2kYRAilGAJ4uRlV5jjEw8mFCuvsVzacF28UWzwCfUX5B hTuJyygkx8BY2C0ks1gmS7Y= =X8xH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----