11 Sep
2006
11 Sep
'06
4:54 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:47:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:52:39PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
I saw the pointer on the Wiki to the ATRPM's repository which had a current RPM, but looking at the included patches in their SRPM they seem to be doing things somewhat differently than the Fedora guys are (default settings, etc.)
Can you provide some more detail on that?
I checked the default settings patches again in case I missed something and everything looks ok (in the sense that it replicates Fedora Core's choices irresp. of whether they are good or not).
I assume you just missed something while reviewing or got confused otherwise. Please always underlay your arguments with details. I now wasted some time on reviewing the patch line by line to check whether there was a slip since you didn't specify details.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net