Yes, I think treating mailboxes similary to keywords is ideal. There Except if you want to handle some mailboxes in a special way it's easier if they're separated on disk. Such as renaming or deleting mailboxes is a lot easier.They're based on filtering rules. I don't
Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 schrieb Timo Sirainen: think they support "copying" messages. So the virtual folders are easily rebuilt by just re-applying the filters into all the messages.
Not neccessarily if you add one level of indirection, simply numbering the mailboxes by index numbers internally and providing a number/name mapping somewhere. This way, a mailbox can be renamed easily simply by updating the map, and might by deleted by removing the map entry. Stale index number may be left in the messages and might cleaned up the next time a message's folder list is updated or messages are expunged.
Greetings,
Gunter
-- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ PEOPLE'S WHOLE LIVES *DO* PASS IN FRONT OF THEIR EYES BEFORE THEY DIE. THE PROCESS IS CALLED 'LIVING'. -- (Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt! +