On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:10, Sean Kamath <kamath@moltingpenguin.com> wrote:
On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:19, @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote:
On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote:
if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {
if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*" { set :lower "name" "${1}"; redirect :copy "backup+295.${name}@@*example.com*"; }
## Started executing script 'bcc' 5: envelope test 5: starting `:matches' match with `i;ascii-casemap' comparator: 5: getting `to' part from message envelope 5: extracting `detail' part from address <kremels@kreme.com> 5: finishing match with result: not matched 5: jump if result is false 5: jumping to line 7 ## Finished executing script 'bcc'
If I read that bcc trace, it says “extracting ‘detail’ part from address <kremels@kreme.com>”.
OK, but that exact line is used in several examples online to get the email address. And it doesn't explain why "if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {" also failed to match despite also showing the email address.
“kremels@kreme.com” does not have a :detail part (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples talks about this).
And I am not asking for :detail, nor am I trying to the the address extension/plus address.
If it were “kremels+thing@kreme.com” then the net line out to say “finished match with result: ‘thing’” or some such.
It should not because I am not asking for the detail, I am only asking for :matches "*" -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "Well, I think so, Brain, but I can't memorize a whole opera in Yiddish."