21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
6:57 p.m.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/20/2008, Mike Malsman (zep@ni.enate.org) wrote:
Is this something that would be useful to anyone else?
PopB4smtp is really insecure, and should be avoided if at all possible... so hopefully , it won't be useful to too many people... ;)
I see this mechanic as not being specific to pop3/imap-before-smtp.
I'm not sure in what other ways people use replacement imap/pop3
processes, but the destination address seems like a useful piece of
information.
You really should set up sasl/smtpauth and just deal with the one time pain of changing over... it will be worth it...
In fact I have. Thanks for the suggestion!
-Mike