2 Sep
2009
2 Sep
'09
8:09 p.m.
Quoting "Timo Sirainen" <tss@iki.fi>:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:41 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
Yep, POP on port 110. If I have them change to port 113 (which directs to qmail-pop3 on another server) I'm told it works fine.
What if you make Dovecot listen on non-110 port? Because I'd guess non-110 port could just bypass AVG's checks..
Hmm that's a thought. But what I want to achieve is no change to the
client. I already have port 112 point to Dovecot.
It would definitely be a good test to see if the port # change
disables AVG, cause then moving 110 back to the qmail-pop3 server
wouldn't have any affect, which with that new insight, I'm now even
more confident I already tried.
So now I'm leaning back towards AVG being an issue :(
Rick