Is there a fix coming for this, Timo? Or is it a longer term issue?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx@gmail.com> wrote:
It doesn't in my current 2.2.18 setup with the config I posted.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote:
It should.
On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx@gmail.com> wrote:
should fts_autoindex handle that case?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote:
On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
that the fts data gets lost?
All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder.
Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx@gmail.com US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx@gmail.com US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx@gmail.com US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961