25 Jun
2012
25 Jun
'12
10:07 p.m.
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:54 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.6.2012, at 19.49, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'd suggest you try again with 2.1.7...
The rewritten dsync is in v2.2 tree. v2.1's dsync is a fixed version of v2.0's dsync. I have no idea why v2.1's dsync would be less reliable than v2.0's. It only had bugfixes.
Anyway, the GUID error could very well be because of buggy mailbox listing code in v2.0, which was rewritten for v2.1.
I will try the latest 2.1.x code and see what happens. dsync in 2.0.xseems to work just fine... most of the time.
...Jeff