28 Jan
2007
28 Jan
'07
5:07 p.m.
Hi Timo, many thanks for the numbers.
Maybe having a raiserfs/etx3 on top of XFS have some perfomance implications. But it should work fine for general benchmark
It would be nice to have a benchmark using the same disk and the filesystem formated on a disk partition. I say the same disk because some part of a hard disk are faster than other (inner/outer tracks)
My current setup is ext3 and maildir, so I think I should be ok with the perfomance. ;)
Regards, Oliver
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Ah, yes, I didn't think there would be that big of a difference. Creating a 100MB file inside the XFS system and using it as reiserfs gave these numbers:
-- Oliver Schulze L. | Get my e-mail after a captcha in: Asuncion - Paraguay | http://tinymailto.com/oliver