Am 24.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Simon B:
On 24 Jul 2013 09:44, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
Am 24.07.2013 09:21, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Reindl, keep this kind of crap off the list. It benefits nobody here and simply wastes resources. Either send it off list, or better yet, don't sent it at all. You got yourself booted from Postfix-users for this type of behavior
no - i got removed because *of you* and your message below which resulted in undersatndable anger
Really Reindl, I find myself unable to support you in any of the salient points you make because of your attitude and anger management issues. If the calm, rational email below resulted in understandable anger then you have issues best not dealt with in a public forum.
ah and "Normally I'd avoid arguing with your Reindl as it simply clutters the list" is a good attitude followed by technical nonsense?
When did you last come across a domain configured strictly for fallback to A? While RFC may require it, and some used it in the 70s and 80s, no receivers rely on fallback to A in 2013
is wrong, i came across such domains 2011 and not in the 70s and 80s period
Anyone versed sufficiently in SMTP to know of the existence of fallback to A isn't going to rely on it - They'll have proper MX records
is nice, but in the real world there are *way to much* not versed admins proven daily on several mailings-lists where you face admins never should have connected a server to the internet as well as you do not need a MX record at all if your incoming mailserver is on the A-Record
the MX-Record is for the cases where on http://your-domain/ is a website while the same machine is not your incoming mailserver