On 28/12/2017 07:38, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Saw the new repository notification, and figured what the heck I would try letting it upgrade me from the current v2.2.22 release that apparently is in the Ubuntu 16.04 packages, to the new repository release of v2.3.0.
I followed the info on repo.dovecot.org, and first it started bitching about lmtp (dovecot: master: Fatal: service(lmtp) access(/usr/lib/dovecot/lmtp) failed: No such file or directory), so I went back and installed the dovecot-lmtpd package and that seemed to fix that issue. Just FYI, I had dovecot-core, dovecot-imapd, and dovecot-pop3d installed on the system.
OK, so now it started up, said it was 2.3.0 and I thought all was good, but now all authentication is failing. I turned on some of the logging debugging, and am seeing the below:
dovecot: auth-worker(19578): Debug: pam(toss1,127.0.0.1,
): lookup service=dovecot dovecot: auth-worker(19578): Debug: pam(toss1,127.0.0.1, ): #1/1 style=1 msg=Password: dovecot: auth-worker(19578): pam(toss1,127.0.0.1, ): pam_authenticate() failed: System error dovecot: auth: Debug: client passdb out: FAIL#0111#011user=toss1 dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts in 3 secs): user=<toss1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.1.1, session= I took and compared my auth files like 10-auth.conf, and auth-system.conf.ext, and they are identical between the two versions, even though they were overwritten as part of the upgrade.
If I just uninstall the 2.3.0 release, and install 2.2.22 back on the server, it all just starts working again. So for now I am back on 2.2, but was willing to give 2.3 a run if I can get it going. Any ideas as to what to look at to get this working, would be great. As stated above, this is Ubuntu Server 16.04.03, and I am also running Postfix and amavis-new, but don't think they should really impact me using dovecot for email over POP3 or IMAP..
Howard Leadmon PBW Communications, LLC http://www.pbwcomm.com
Why on earth you think you could upgrade versions by using two unrelated and different repo's is beyond me.
This has always been a problem, even back in the 90's with the RPMs, RH v say for example Fresh, because package maintainers will package differently.
Its like trying to stick a cisco 1800 image on an ASR9K and expecting it to work perfectly.
Though we don't use deb or rpm based systems and haven't for about 15 years, if I was to, I think I'd be using the creators version, and not a distro's version.
-- Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privilegedinformation, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments, immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only PDF [1] and ODF [2] documents accepted, please do not send proprietary formatted documents
Links:
[1] http://www.adobe.com/ [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument