I'd tend to agree, but Timo is quite conservative with version numbers.
We're running "Dovecot-1.0-stable" in production, which was a "frozen" version of "Dovecot-1.0-testXX" series with important bugfixes backported.
In practice, Dovecot-1.0-alpha4 has less bugs, and is probably now the most "stable" 1.0 version (I'd consider it at least a beta, or even a release candidate). There are lots of bugs in 0.99.x that probably aren't going to get fixed.
Best Wishes, Chris
chayes@afo.net wrote:
Chris,
My policy has always been not to use alphas or betas on production systems.
What's the projection for Dovecot coming out of beta?Cliff
-- --+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+- Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin@reading.ac.uk IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 8439 Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094