Am 09.07.2012 21:29, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 7/9/2012 3:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.07.2012 07:48, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
disagreed with my statement, then agreed with it. Apparently you didn't realize you did so. Would you please clarify what I stated that is "simply not true"? You comment WRT SSD doesn't prove anything I said to be untrue. Quite the contrary, you reinforced my statements.
Actually the only storage i use are mainstream SATA drives
ouch - that said and your offlist discussion why SAN storages are crap for you gives a picture - nobody, really nobody is using SATA for any production-storage
That's simply not true Reindl.
SATA drives are being used very widely in production today, and outnumber SAS deployments by a very wide margin.
for SOHO with no public services, yes
SAS is found today almost exclusively in high volume transactional servers such as mail spools, mail stores, databases, VM image storage, and applications that need higher reliability, such as medical imaging systems, etc
well, we are speaking about mail spools and mail storages here i thought
additionally my mail storage lives on virtual machines as any other services started some years ago and finsihed 2010 moving the last bare-metal server to VM infrastructzre
in these environments you find near to zero SATA only few people these does are doing bare metal installs in days where hardware supported virtaliziation has nearly zero overhead