28 Apr
2006
28 Apr
'06
1:03 a.m.
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:54 -0700, richs@whidbey.net wrote:
I'd like to propose the attached patch to add an optional "outlook- dates" IMAP workaround, which returns the message "Date:" even when
INTERNALDATE is specified.
Oh, that's evil. I always want to sort using the real INTERNALDATE because Date-header can sometimes be broken (especially with spams).
Since "BODY.PEEK" is being called anyway, our tests didn't reveal any
performance impact. Can anyone think of a scenario this would
negatively impact? Another option might be to patch the APPEND function?
APPEND sounds better to me.. You could even make it get the timestamp from the first Received-header if it exists, which makes it pretty close to INTERNALDATE's idea.