28 Mar
2007
28 Mar
'07
8:46 a.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers. But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I like (a) but even better I like 1.1.0{a,b,rc}N -> 1.1.0
Even-odd is confusing because you can't tell which 1.1.x versions are newer than any 1.2.y version.
You misunderstood that. After the release of 1.2.0, 1.1.x is frozen and development starts again in 1.3.0.
--
Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li
Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux