indra wardhana wrote:
Lars Stavholm wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to dovecot (coming from cyrus) and have a bit of a problem setting up postfix + dspam + dovecot.
- postfix + dovecot: works like a charm.
Using "mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver" in postfix main.cf
- adding dspam to the equation: unable to deliver: net_connect(/usr/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: No such file or directory where u put auth-master , on dovecot.conf
Have no idea, don't use it. Since case 1. above worked as is, I didn't think I'd be meeding any more than what's in there. I've included my dovecot.conf below.
Using "mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/tmp/dspam.sock" in postfix main.cf (instead of the above mailbox_command), and the corresponding setting in master.cf.
In /etc/dspam.conf I'm using... TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver"
And here's the full error message:
Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie postfix/pickup[18313]: 090F1C042: uid=0 from=<root> Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie postfix/cleanup[7010]: 090F1C042: message-id=20070911001038.090F1C042@nwinnie.telcotec.se Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie postfix/qmgr[18318]: 090F1C042: from=root@nwinnie.telcotec.se, size=431, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie deliver(stava@nwinnie.telcotec.se): net_connect(/usr/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: No such file or directory Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie dspam[10379]: Delivery agent returned exit code 75: /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d stava@nwinnie.telcotec.se Sep 11 02:10:38 nwinnie postfix/lmtp[7018]: 090F1C042: to=stava@nwinnie.telcotec.se, orig_to=<stava>, relay=nwinnie.telcotec.se[/var/tmp/dspam.sock], delay=0.35, delays=0.32/0.01/0.01/0.01, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (host nwinnie.telcotec.se[/var/tmp/dspam.sock] said: 421 4.3.0 stava@nwinnie.telcotec.se Delivered (in reply to end of DATA command))
So, postfix hands the message to dspam, dspam does its thing, dspam tries to deliver and fails.
What throws me is that the delivery works as expected in case 1) but not in case 2), despite the fact I'm using the same delivery agent, i.e. /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver.
Why would dovecot go for some other authentication method in case 2)?
BTW, we're using PAM on top of LDAP.
Any ideas appreciated.
Cheers /Lars
base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s listen = * disable_plaintext_auth = no shutdown_clients = yes syslog_facility = mail ssl_disable = yes login_dir = /var/run/dovecot/login login_user = dovecot mail_location = maildir:~/Mail mail_extra_groups = mail mail_full_filesystem_access = yes protocol imap { login_executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login mail_executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/imap imap_client_workarounds = outlook-idle } protocol pop3 { login_executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3-login mail_executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3 pop3_uidl_format = %v.%u mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/pop3 pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls } protocol lda { postmaster_address = postmaster@localhost mail_plugins = quota cmusieve mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lda } auth_executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-auth auth_verbose = yes auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth default { mechanisms = plain login gssapi passdb pam { args = blocking=yes dovecot } userdb passwd { args = blocking=yes } user = root } dict { } plugin { quota = fs:storage=102400:messages=0 trash = /etc/dovecot/trash.conf sieve = .dovecot.sieve }
Thanks /Lars