Re: [Dovecot] 'Doveadm user' could use better error codes

On 28-12-10 16:07, David Ford wrote:

dovecot, the whole point of his original email is to return a useful error code for the purpose of scripting. :) always returning 0 for both valid and invalid usernames isn't helpful

-d

OK,

But the original mail show an invalid use of the doveadm command 'doveadm user', which correctly produced a return-value of '1'

And a correclty formed command 'doveadm user foo', which correctly returned '0'

At the end of 'man doveadm-user' it says: "REPORTING BUGS Report bugs, including doveconf -n output, to the Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org."

While i think this is a change-request, and not a bug, i still wonder what the output of 'dovecot -n' will help in this case ;-)

-- Luuk