17 Jan
2011
17 Jan
'11
8:32 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:16:50PM -0800, Brad Davidson wrote:
Don't give up on the simplest solution too easily - lots of us run NFS with quite large installs. As a matter of fact, I think all of the large installs run NFS; hence the need for the Director in 2.0.
Not all, if this counts as large:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/gpfsmail 9.9T 8.7T 1.2T 88% /maildirs
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/gpfsmail 105279488 90286634 14992854 86% /maildirs
Running GPFS, with 7 nodes all active against the same filesystem. But the Director should still be useful..
-jf