15 Feb
2007
15 Feb
'07
8:19 p.m.
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:14 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
So the result will be a huge merging headache when all the remaining 1.0 bugfixes need to be forward ported. Particularly with inferior merging systems such as CVS, it's going to be a lot of maintenance overhead without guarantees of getting it right.
Actually CVS HEAD and branch_1_0 has existed for almost a year already, and I've been committing all the fixes to both branches.. Yea, kind of annoying, but I still haven't figured out what I'd like to switch to from CVS :)