-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 20:23 schrieb Payton:
Following that advice, I used tethereal to dump a test transaction of both setups. Comparing the IMAP chatter, there is basically no difference! In
The flags returned for INBOX differ:
"Response: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft NotJunk Junk)"
Maybe entourage chokes on the last two ones? The "\" seems to be missing, which has already been mentioned as a bug on this list IIRC. However that#s just a wild and blind guess as I virtually know nothing about the IMAP protocol in paticular.
Greetings,
Gunter
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ <frogman> how can i tell if i am getting attacked by another computer? <jedd> frogman: you'll have keyboard imprints on your forehead. -- Life in irc://irc.freenode.org/#debian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ http://www.lspace.org +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt! +
iD8DBQE/v+B+0ORHvREo8l8RAlSLAJ9Bqg6QBPgLnbMMth5a7KcHiJyJSwCfTwfw lvyB1Hpk2J5KhDJS8WIMBbQ= =cOMR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----