-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Ben Marsh wrote:
What happens when users find that they can store stuff in the Trash dir when they are out of quota in the other folders? Such behavior would make trash a
Therefore I wrote before:
I agree that it is not good to have an unlimited Trash folder, but to move a message from one folder into Trash should be always possible.
periodic enforced purges of the trash but that wouldn't go down well (At least where I work).
Here as well.
- While moving a message do not touch maildirsize at all at least that one of the folders involved (origin / destination) were Trash.
Given that there is no move in the IMAP specification, Dovecot would have to do a lookahead to find the expunge command after the copy command for all move operations. That would mean that dovecot would have to falsely return success for all copies in order to "see" the next IMAP command. In short I don't think that it is good/desirable behavior because of these problems.
OK, that's a problem.
Hm, one could restrict this to Trash and rollback the action after the user logs out, N commands or something else, unless the original messages had been expunged. How about to have a feature like "try to hardlink when COPY into Trash"?
Bye,
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRWP6cy9SORjhbDpvAQIyQwf/UqvCpY2E7gRJtaYezHz/PJQLg/RPe8p4 uXpcj68VTSru6GSoyOanVY0jm5UfK5drFixtsh2TjW9ORTLrmTOs8NCW3746EbWh U8nABxR6zvum45epegV15o6YgvaAWZnk1SZjAf6LXckn2TkkhE6h7kDzmlqFkemn H0qmpBw/1apk6B1RFx7wE21rv8r7z2uCQqLlAPf8sTDihNVyR2DWOz53ShmzKLzg bfFuzGFFps2ZaHgWF44gkhxDgyEwRIlP1T9UaVOWgNrnxY3t3eSE0dJugfqj2qJM Qw9nl1ezEfubvvRn3tzLsygohlZ62M7kCFA7LebSqsk/2H1lQVOdgw== =rKcc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----