6 Apr
2016
6 Apr
'16
3:03 a.m.
Op 4/6/2016 om 12:14 AM schreef Marc Schiffbauer:
- Timo Sirainen schrieb am 05.04.16 um 19:29 Uhr: […]
So now I'm mainly wondering if ':' is a good character? Has somebody already changed mail_log_prefix in a way that these additional ':' chars might break their log parsers (e.g. mail_log_prefix=%u:%s%{session}:%r). Why not use another '+'?
That '+' in the example is just part of the Base64 encoding, so it is not a separator.
Regards,
Stephan.