22 Sep
2015
22 Sep
'15
10:01 p.m.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yeah. The ssl_client_ca_file was implemented later than the SSL proxying code. I think this may be something that needs to wait for v2.3 to get fixed. v2.3 hopefully removes the duplicated ssl code and uses lib-ssl-iostream for proxying also, which makes this easier to implement.
Thanks, Timo. I'll use the ssl_ca workaround for now.