On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting "Harlan Stenn" Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com:
I would have preferred this be a private reply but I like to honor the sender's request re Reply-To:.
I have a slight preference for keeping the [Dovecot] prefix in the Subject: header, as it makes it really obvious to me where a message in my inbox comes from. I have never liked to pre-sort incoming messages into separate folders. The fact that the prefix is relativelyh short also helps.
H
I think those of us who don't filter are benefited the most by having the prefix. I'm on a couple lists that aren't filtered, though not as high traffic.
I don't read ALL email, and would prefer to delete non-relevant emails without opening the message. Without a prefix, I sometimes have a hard time telling if a problem is directed to me (personal/biz support) or a list when I delete in bulk via thin clients (iPhone, Horde).
+1
I let lower traffic lists land in my inbox. I eat my own dogfood as well as far as mail is concerned, and we don't let users configure procmail (at some point they'll get basic sieve support). I also find myself checking email quite often on my phone, and seeing the listname in the subject is very helpful.
Charles
Rick