On Aug 15, 2007, at 5:00 AM, dovecot-request@dovecot.org wrote:
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:58:40 +0200 From: martin f krafft madduck@madduck.net Subject: Re: [Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable? To: dovecot@dovecot.org Message-ID: 20070814225840.GA23721@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
also sprach Charles Marcus CMarcus@Media-Brokers.com
[2007.08.14.2028 +0200]:Well, the whole point of sieve, I believe, is to make it
something that an admin would want to let arbitrary users modify on their own
recognizance, and the ability to specify arbitrary programs to run would be
just *asking* to be hacked.Wouldn't a decent, secure alternative to procmail be sieve+amavisd- new?
Except it's not really possible to make amavisd-new do per-user spam filtering. And it's even more of a performance hog.
-- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
"all language designers are arrogant. goes with the territory..." -- larry wall
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net