17 Jul
2009
17 Jul
'09
10:57 p.m.
On 7/17/2009, Timo Sirainen (tss@iki.fi) wrote:
Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the move/conversion.
This just sounds great, and yes, I can definitely see a need for both.
I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server that aren't in the primary server, it most likely means you just lost some mails on your primary server and you need to get them back.
Or you just deleted them and *don't* want them back... ;)
--
Best regards,
Charles