On 11/04/2019 00:18, Laura Smith via dovecot wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:24 PM, Aki Tuomi aki.tuomi@open-xchange.com wrote:
On 10 April 2019 23:56 Laura Smith via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 9:14 PM, Aki Tuomi < aki.tuomi@open-xchange.com> wrote:
On 10 April 2019 23:13 Laura Smith via dovecot dovecot@dovecot.org wrote: Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 8:20 PM, Aki Tuomi aki.tuomi@open-xchange.com wrote:
> On 10 April 2019 22:13 Laura Smith via dovecot dovecot@dovecot.org wrote: > On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 7:57 PM, Aki Tuomi aki.tuomi@open-xchange.com wrote: >>> On 10 April 2019 21:26 Laura Smith via dovecot dovecot@dovecot.org wrote: >>> ========================================================================== >>> dsync( foobar@example.com): Error: imapc(foobar.example.com:993): dns_lookup(foobar.example.com) failed: read(/var/run/dovecot/dns-client) failed: read(size=512) failed: Connection reset by peer >> This is dovecot's internal dns-client, and something goes wrong when talking to the service. >>> dsync( foobar@example.com): Error: Failed to initialize user: imapc: Login to foobar.example.com failed: Disconnected from server >> This is btw dsync service, not imap service. >>> === >>> Initially I thought "oh no, not another AppArmor block". >>> But then surely the second message would not appear if the DNS lookup was not successful ? >>> Also "dig foobar.example.com" works fine. >>> How should I be troubleshooting this ? And if it is still likely to be AppArmor, what is calling it ? "doveadm" itself or something else ? What does "/var/run/dovecot/dns-client" do and why doesn't dovecot use standard OS calls like everyone else ? >> Because the "standard OS call" is blocking and we would prefer it to not block everything else. >>> So many questions ! >> Aki > Thanks for your reply, but both those message are generated from a simple : > doveadm -v -o mail_fsync=never backup -R -u foobar@example.com imapc: > So I don't know what you mean about dsync service failing ? Surely the DNS lookup succeeded if the 'dsync service' failed due to remote disconnect ? > I'm still none the wiser as to where to start looking for troubleshoting ? Did you check dovecot logs? Maybe there is something useful? Aki Only the same old cryptic message about dns-client ? master: Fatal: execv(/usr/lib/dovecot/dns-client) failed: Permission denied Something prevents executing the dns-client binary. master: Error: service(dns_client): command startup failed, throttling for 16 secs dns_client: Fatal: master: service(dns_client): child 14293 returned error 84 (exec() failed) Aki Yes but is it being called by doveadm directly or by some other dovecot program ? If I'm going to have to go down the AppArmor route, then I would prefer if you told me what was calling it instead of me having to un-necessarily spend time doing straces !
Also, should I be able to call dns-client directly myself ? (or is there a way to do so to enable testing ? It is started by dovecot's master process when you connect to dns-client unix socket. You can try
socat stdio unix-connect:/var/run/dovecot/dns-client
I thought apparmor tells when something is blocked into kernel log? have you checked dmesg?
Apologies for your frustration.
Yeah nothing in dmesg. I'm still hunting around to find some log somewhere but so far silence.
"socat stdio unix-connect:/var/run/dovecot/dns-client" runs but returns nothing. Is that expected ?
When you say "dovecot's master process", so doveadm sync talks to the master process ? So in terms of apparmor I would therefore be looking at /usr/sbin/dovecot ? If that's the case, the relevant apparmor permisssions are already provided : /{,var/}run/dovecot/ rw, /{,var/}run/dovecot/** rw,
Laura
Do the above apparmor settings give permission to dovecot to execute /usr/lib/dovecot/dns-client, assuming that the user under which dovecot is running already has file system permissions to do that?
John