-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Egbert Jan wrote:
Just a stupid suggestion from a newcomer... Why not introducing a separate quotum for Trash? Could be a percentage of total quota or a predifined amount independent of 'real' quota.
OK, consider the following scenario:
All the mailboxes except Trash may allocate 500MB. Trash may allocate any percentage below 100% of 500MB.
One message arrives of the size 500MB, it get spooled into INBOX.
Now try to do anything with it.
OK, this is a worst-case scenario; the independed Trash quota must be larger than or equal to the maximum message size you accept.
Second, someone already pointed out that the user can use Trash as yet-another-folder, e.g. to store information. You effectively increased the quota of the user, or you lower the user's quota (in the view of the user) by reserving part of his quota for Trash. Well, many people will point out that hard disk space is cheap today.
In my opinion, one user has one quota for all the message storred on the system. I used to empose file system quota, with the same effect that a full mailbox locks the users from deleting through Trash. :-(
Bye.
Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRWQFyC9SORjhbDpvAQJ8ZAf+NE4EgbpL6pDlrQdm4mYpN/ia0WJ3bhuq r4ii7h4oEUzjopgE2YpTx3tL+m1j1voEF2Paa4ypKyPZmjW4qpJ1SRvlY1BrTpJQ SblYIMXD9fLI4ubf0v5YT/t/Z0g2ppp3XUF2iZ8nN77v7Sug5CZ0GELJgo7q3ss9 RVVsbyyk7cyWn0pZsoK5UNmS08iI0MdUbdreg4EPMncQ4l9N0N4EfeZ4yHHRYZaf EcF7S+XDxGQBlmIx2CujADKIqGDS82ydf4WuhNJ4BDkFKrikVggFoiMIUr9tXh96 cTlZP3KQ0yEjt9S8visZrxTAfuTPATiK9mnJ8F/Hs5x+eyZR0o3cmw== =8cUg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----