18 Jun
2012
18 Jun
'12
9:06 p.m.
thank you very much for help!
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat. Better in what respect?
less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)
Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.