9 Oct
2004
9 Oct
'04
2:55 p.m.
On 8.10.2004, at 04:35, Adam Pordzik wrote:
Although I appreciate your work I doubt that this is the right way: Everytime a new encryption comes to any ldap-server, dovecot has to follow. I'm really, really no Unix/C programer, so I can't appraise what makes more work: To (re-)implement a new hash algorithm or to support auth. ldap binds.
Originally when I implemented LDAP support I didn't even know there existed such things as authentication binds. And later I just haven't cared myself enough about that issue, I don't need it and there are more important things for me to do. The annoying thing with it is that it'd have to be implemented asynchronously, which may not be simple.