On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:00 PM, Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi wrote:
On 19.11.2013, at 22.36, Stephan Bosch stephan@rename-it.nl wrote:
On 11/19/2013 8:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.11.2013, at 0.21, Mike Selner @ Yahoo mselner@yahoo.com wrote:
They can add a different :handle parameter to get a different response, but .. as I understand it, a different vacation reason message should also trigger a separate vacation notice, but looks like Pigeonhole doesn’t currently do that. Stephan?
It should though. It implements the behavior recommended in the RFC (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230#section-4.2); i.e., generate a handle from the provided arguments (ignoring variables!) if none is provided explicitly. This is performed here:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/file/b7434a02fc51/src/lib-siev...
So did you test this unsuccessfully or did you have problems finding it in the sources? If it doesn't work it would obviously be a bug. The constructed handle value can be seen by dumping the Sieve script binary with sieve-dump.
Oh, I just didn’t look into the correct place in the code. I didn’t think that handle would be generated before ext_vacation_operation_execute(). So answer to Mike: Just have them change the reason string in some way.
Thank you! That did the trick. If they change the vacation message it will send an auto- response even if it had previously responded to the same person.
Mike