24 Aug
2012
24 Aug
'12
7:56 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen said the following on 23/08/12 22:49:
Is there a reason why 172.16.0.0/12 was left out of the change ^^ ? Is it actually used? :)
YES!
I have a big customer (400 PCs) with 172.16.0.0/16 internal network and a subnet of 192.168.0.0 for DMZ
I use it more than 192.168 when I create networks.
Ciao, luigi
/ +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \
Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlA3CYkACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZSRaQCgy1YilsGEL7JXIDabKm+zSjZN cvEAoKYqE1ZjbR/g1XTiHUvlfpPuvWAE =RSAO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----