24 Nov
2009
24 Nov
'09
5:58 a.m.
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Shouldn't that be more like:
reject "this guy is gone"; keep;
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in which the replacement guy would still access the leaving guy's mailbox.
They felt that just deactivating the mailbox and rejecting mails would be "rude".
Ah, but that's why I had the "keep" there! The reject message of course could have been nicer and said how the guy is gone but this address will be read for a bit longer but anyway stop sending mail here.