What is the reasoning behind that `<' anyway? It just appears so odd that a path should have that at its front.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:20:25 +0200, you wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 07:38 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured out what my problem was, and it's something I thought *FOR SURE* I had fixed. I've looked at this thing so many times, I fell into the trap of not seeing the forest for the trees. I had inadvertently omitted the '<' before the first certificate definition. I guess there really is something to the technique of walking away from a problem for a while--in this case, overnight--and then coming tack to it and seeing it as if for the first time. I am able to successfully connect via Telnet and will carry on with my testing and integration with Postfix. Thanks to all for their help.
No need to. I'ts just another addition addition to a "knowledge" base, which might be helpful for someone else sometimes else.
Congrats for your problem being solved and thanks for sharing it for further references.
Regards, -M