25 Jan
2010
25 Jan
'10
9:38 p.m.
On 25.1.2010, at 21.30, Brandon Davidson wrote:
Unfortunately we're currently using LDAP auth via PAM... so even if I could get the SQL and monitoring issues resolved, I think I'd have a hard time convincing my peers that adding a SQL server as a single point of failure was a good idea. If it could be set up to just fall back to using a local connection in the event of a SQL server outage, that might help things a bit. Anyone know how that might work?
Well, you can always fall back to LDAP if SQL isn't working.. Just something like:
passdb sql { .. } passdb ldap { .. }