On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:18:57 +0300 Timo Sirainen tss@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:50 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
BTW, I noticed the following during a manual test via telnet:
2 status misc/spam (UNSEEN) 2 NO Mailbox doesn't exist: misc.spam
You're right! I only fixed the "OK" response. I'll try and do the other for completeness.
Probably too much trouble, if it's even possible to fix all of them..
I had a look, and concluded it wasn't worth it :)
There's a bit easier way to do it too, just send client back the mailbox exactly as it sent it to Dovecot :) I did it like that to CVS.
I wondered about that, but I was a bit concerned that it might want a parsed version of the mailbox name in the response. It's certainly much simpler your way!
Best Wishes, Chris
--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-- Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin@reading.ac.uk IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 8439 Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094