What's her point really ? That someone owes her up to date, FREE, secure software that she wants to use in a commercial setting ?
This has been debated ad nauseum. Get your expectations in check.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38301710
On Wednesday, 26/06/2024 at 16:13 Simon B via dovecot wrote:
With all due respect, you're welcome to disagree with Laura's point, but she does have one.
So, please take your ad hominem attacks elsewhere.
Regards
Simon
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, 21:55 Michael Tokarev via dovecot, wrote:
Can we please stop this thread here?
Clearly, Laura does not seek solutions, the intention seems to be shouting at people.
As they say, don't feed the trolls, - don't give more caises fpr shouting. Let this thread die in peace.
Thanks,
/mjt
Why do you care about the repo then ? Use the patch locally, publish it, etc. You care about OpenSSL 3.0 compatibility right ? What do you care if it's in the public tree or not.
Because Aki has been shouting from the rooftops here that "beware, its not that easy, Dovecot crashes with OpenSSL 3.0".
Aki has seen the OpenSSL 3 code already present in Debian (and Ubuntu and Fedora, its the same code) and supposedly that causes crashes.
I'm sure the people who submitted code to the Fedora tree are much better programmers than I am, and if their efforts are not good enough,
26.06.2024 22:26, Laura Smith via dovecot wrote: then, well...
So, if we rephrase it, Aki is effectively telling people not to
waste their time trying to patch OpenSSL 3.0 compatibility into 2.3
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave@dovecot.org
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave@dovecot.org