On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 07:11:55PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hmm. I guess I didn't then understand the question. It looked like a mixed mbox/maildir tree. Mapping sounds like namespaces that Dovecot already has:
/ -> $HOME/mbox /INBOX -> /var/spool/<username> /folder -> $HOME/mail/folder /folder/foo -> $HOME/mail/folder/foo /folder/bar -> $HOME/mail/folder/bar /folder/foo/bar -> $HOME/mail/folder/foo/barThere can't be a mailbox named "/" (or ""), so the first one couldn't work? The others could probably be done using namespaces? Assuming you're talking about only mboxes here, not maildirs.
Actually, in my example, / and /INBOX are mboxes ($HOME/mbox and /var/spool/<username> respectively), while everything in /folder are maildirs. The two wishes I've been trying to demonstrate in this example are: (1) dotless maildirs and subfolders, and (2) mapping the IMAP root folder (I understood there is something like that, that is - IMAP mail folders are a rooted hierarchy) to some specific mbox/maildir.
Cheers, -- Tom
-- Tom Alsberg - hacker (being the best description fitting this space) Web page: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~alsbergt/ DISCLAIMER: The above message does not even necessarily represent what my fingers have typed on the keyboard, save anything further.