[Dovecot] docs for anvil?
are there any docs for anvil config & usage in 2.0?
afaict, nothing's mentioned in the wiki ...
thx.
On 10/13/2009 07:27 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
are there any docs for anvil config & usage in 2.0?
afaict, nothing's mentioned in the wiki ...
The wiki is not yet 'v2.0-ready'. Anvil works in the background. Usage: $PREFIX/sbin/dovecot [starts also anvil] $PREFIX/sbin/dovecot stop [stops also anvil] ;-)
Configuration via master.conf.
Regards, Pascal
The trapper recommends today: 5e1f1e55.0928619@localdomain.org
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:27 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
are there any docs for anvil config & usage in 2.0?
I wasn't really planning on writing any docs for it. If you need to talk to it, the source code will tell you the protocol. :) There's nothing to configure in it beyond the normal service {} settings.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:27 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
are there any docs for anvil config & usage in 2.0?
I wasn't really planning on writing any docs for it. If you need to talk to it, the source code will tell you the protocol. :) There's nothing to configure in it beyond the normal service {} settings.
How about just what it does?
Is it postfix's anvil (http://linux.die.net/man/8/anvil)?
If it _is_, there are certainly a number of configuration parameters available ... the "process_limit" in master.conf NOT being one of them.
Is it _only_ for use with postfix? If we don't use postfix, can/should we disable it?
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 11:00 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
I wasn't really planning on writing any docs for it. If you need to talk to it, the source code will tell you the protocol. :) There's nothing to configure in it beyond the normal service {} settings.
How about just what it does?
Is it postfix's anvil (http://linux.die.net/man/8/anvil)?
Its idea and name was stolen from Postfix, but that's all.
Is it _only_ for use with postfix? If we don't use postfix, can/should we disable it?
It's disabled automatically if it's not needed. It's currently only used by mail_max_userip_connections setting to track how many connections a user+ip combination has to the server.
participants (3)
-
Pascal Volk
-
PGNet Dev
-
Timo Sirainen