Re: [Dovecot] highly available userdb
On 11/12/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfrode@tanso.net wrote:
My installation is only serving 1/10 of your size, but long time ago we migrated off mysql for userdatabase, and over to LDAP. The MySQL data source had issues (not dovecot related), and didn't seem like the right tool for the job.
A database is a database, a master is a master, and a slave is a slave our mysql has never had problem, not a single one, its why I'm so annoyed dovecot is talking to master when it doesn't need to
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:52:09PM +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 11/12/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfrode@tanso.net wrote:
My installation is only serving 1/10 of your size, but long time ago we migrated off mysql for userdatabase, and over to LDAP. The MySQL data source had issues (not dovecot related), and didn't seem like the right tool for the job.
A database is a database, a master is a master, and a slave is a slave
And some databases are better for some tasks than others. F.ex. LDAP gives dovecot free failover between servers. Handled in the ldap libraries. One could argue that you should be complaining to the MySQL developers about supporting server failover in the client library, and not to Dovecot.
our mysql has never had problem, not a single one, its why I'm so annoyed dovecot is talking to master when it doesn't need to
-jf
participants (2)
-
Jan-Frode Myklebust
-
Nick Edwards