[Dovecot] namespaces in 1.0beta3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello
I'm currently running dovecot-1.0.alpha4-1 on my production system, dovecot-1.0.alpha4-1where I am making use of namespaces. I have downloaded 1.0-beta3 and have installed it on a test system. I have customised the configuration for local use, however when I inserted the namespace settings into my configuration file dovecot refuses to start claiming that there is a problem with the configuration file. Has the format of the namespace configuration changed? (Configuration fragment shown below)
Mark.
# Migration name spaces # # # default namespace namespace private { separator = / prefix = inbox = yes } # for backwards compatibility: namespace private { separator = / prefix = hidden = yes } namespace private { separator = / prefix = mail/ hidden = yes } namespace private { separator = / prefix = ~/mail/ hidden = yes } namespace private { separator = / prefix = ~%u/mail/ hidden = yes }
Mark Nelson - Mark.Nelson@durham.ac.ukdovecot-1.0.alpha4-1
IPPP, Department of Physics, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE Office: +44 (0)191 334 3811, Direct Dial: +44 (0)191 334 3653
PGP Key: http://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/~mn/pgp_key.txt This mail is for the addressee only -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEInzflzM++u0MgcERAmQeAJ9QvkUGcZkL7Spyh1dDt69m/CWXUACcCiq4 re7cEracjrZTyEGJ7qRyos0= =HLtc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:47 +0000, Mark Nelson wrote:
I'm currently running dovecot-1.0.alpha4-1 on my production system, dovecot-1.0.alpha4-1where I am making use of namespaces. I have downloaded 1.0-beta3 and have installed it on a test system. I have customised the configuration for local use, however when I inserted the namespace settings into my configuration file dovecot refuses to start claiming that there is a problem with the configuration file. Has the format of the namespace configuration changed? (Configuration fragment shown below)
No, and your configuration looks fine. What was the exact error message?
participants (2)
-
Mark Nelson
-
Timo Sirainen