[Dovecot] dovecot bug (maybe)

12 May 2009 · *3 1*

      I believe that dovecot is doing something strange, when it founds a
'corrupted' multipart and using fetch body.
Look what I figured out:

Sent a message from squirrelmail (it wrongly drop the last \n from
epilogue):

------=_20090512171902_78105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
n
------=_20090512171902_78105
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
n     <--------(squirrelmail didn´t insert an additional \n).
------=_20090512171902_78105--

Sent a correct message, inserting the last '\n':

------=_20090512171902_78105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
n
------=_20090512171902_78105
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
n
------=_20090512171902_78105--

Compress both messages

Request the messages using: A004 UID FETCH 1 (FLAGS BODYSTRUCTURE)  (the
correct message):

127.000.000.001.00143-127.000.000.001.35604: * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS (\Seen)
BODYSTRUCTURE (("text" "plain" ("charset" "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "8bit" 7 3
NIL NIL NIL NIL)("text" "html" ("charset" "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "8bit"
*3 1*NIL NIL NIL NIL) "alternative" ("boundary"
"----=_20090512171853_50085") NIL
NIL NIL))
A004 OK Fetch completed.
5) Request the broken message:
127.000.000.001.00143-127.000.000.001.43679: * 2 FETCH (UID 2 FLAGS (\Seen)
BODYSTRUCTURE (("text" "plain" ("charset" "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "8bit" 7 3
NIL NIL NIL NIL)("text" "html" ("charset" "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "8bit"
*1 0*NIL NIL NIL NIL) "alternative" ("boundary"
"----=_20090512171902_78105") NIL
NIL NIL))
A004 OK Fetch completed.
...
From RFC the red numbers mean: size body, number of line for the body. This
makes sense, because stripping the 'control' chars from first message, size
and number of lines match. But in the second message, the line number is 0 -
this does not make sense.
You need to test this using telnet, because outlook and thunderbird did not
follow this way, they use body.peek.
What do you think?
Fernando

Fernando Bertasso

tags

participants (1)